
My love for Rutland, Vermont is incorruptable and cannot be questioned. Just something about this city...it has soul. But I need to serve notice on something and will do so now.
If the job of an ambulance service is to get ailing people to the hospital then why must the ambulances originate at the hospital? If it goes something like this: A(hospital) to B(ailing individual) back to A(hospital) doesn't it make sense to have something closer to B anyway?
I'd be interested to see a grid of all the ambulance calls in Rutland over the past five years. I'm sure it would show a trend and wouldn't it make sense to situate the ambulance service close to that epicenter? Here, for instance, is a map of Rutland with an X marking the location of our ambulance service.

With this in mind wouldn't you agree that an ambulance service for Rutland would be, on the basic logical level, of better service here?

B right to A?
Lastly, and this is about to get really wild, if the ambulance service in Rutland boasts 7 ambulances in its fleet is there no profit to be had by having them spread out thusly:

...just sayin'. Why do the ambulances have to originate at the hospital?


